California - AB29 - 2013

Proposition 39: implementation.

View Latest Bill

Economic Development

Added On: 03-30-2013
Updated On: 04-24-2018
Status: Introduced
Primary Sponsor: Das Williams (Democratic)

Actions (10)

  • 12-03-2012 - Read first time. To print.
  • 12-04-2012 - From printer. May be heard in committee January 3.
  • 03-19-2013 - Referred to Coms. on NAT. RES. and U. & C. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Read second time and amended.
  • 03-20-2013 - Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
  • 04-22-2013 - From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on U. & C. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 15).
  • 04-23-2013 - Read second time and amended.
  • 04-24-2013 - Re-referred to Com. on U. & C.
  • 04-29-2013 - In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
  • 01-31-2014 - Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.
  • 02-03-2014 - From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

Votes (1)

DateMotion (click for details)ChamberCommitteeYes
04-15-2013Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on Utilities and CommerceHouse702yes

News (1)

Howard Jarvis, state officials to discuss class action lawsuit against fire fee - Victorville Daily Press
Published by
Wed, 17 Jul 2013 00:15:27 GMT

HJTA is challenging the validity of Assembly Bill 29, the fire prevention fee, by arguing it is a tax, according to the lawsuit's text. ... According to Biddle, the State of California believes AB 29's text did not allow for a class action lawsuit to be levied against it.